Backlog
135Under consideration
request
a button to “favorite” a store would probably be a good idea thank you for reading this
local time !!
The option to set the times to local time! GMT+X is just incomprehensible!
Store Not Actually Hosting Set Champs
For the last couple of sets, I’ve noticed that this store is ‘hosting’ set champs, but joining the event is inaccessible to the general public. I understand that some shops want you to purchase a ticket on their website first, but that isn’t an option with this store. It is my suspicion that they are using fake player accounts to fill the set champs slots and retain the prizing in-store for re-sale purposes. For the Fabled set, I attended set champs here, but since then, the store hasn’t allowed for Illumineers in the area to sign-up. Their event is usually capped at 8 and none of the players are recognizable to any of the players in our area. https://tcg.ravensburgerplay.com/stores/d81896a7-64ee-4c9e-a492-b4a8ab9a9a38 https://tcg.ravensburgerplay.com/events/503397 At time of writing, joining the event is not possible, capacity for the event is set to zero, there’s no way to purchase a ticket for the event on their website and we’re 3 days away from when it’s supposed to fire - seems kind of shady to me.
Skirmish bye
Put a way to see how many bye you have , or atleast if you have 1
Have an idea
It would be nice to see other player’s profiles, or to track players while their playing. I have a lot of friends that now play lorcana and I would like to see how they are doing when their playing in tournaments even if I am not playing at the same location as them
Support SummonersBase as a Riftbound deck sync partner
Featurebase source: https://cardeio.featurebase.app/p/summonersbase-link Submitted: 2026-07-01 by Joe W Upvotes: 1 Category: Player Networks Problem / request: SummonersBase developer saw the Piltover Archive account-linking/deck-sync work and wants SummonersBase supported as a Riftbound deck builder integration. Why this is not ready for implementation: This is a partnership/product decision before it is an engineering task. We need to decide whether to support another external deck-sync partner and what minimum partner contract/security requirements apply. Duplicate / adjacent sweep: No exact SummonersBase ticket found. Adjacent Piltover work exists (, , , ) but is partner-specific. Adjacent generic import items include old/canceled import-export tickets and , but none own this Riftbound/SummonersBase partner request. Open product questions: Do we want to accept SummonersBase as an integration partner for Riftbound? Should future deck-sync partners use a generic partner API/contract or remain bespoke? What requirements must a partner meet: auth/signing, deck schema compatibility, support owner, launch comms, and data/privacy review? 90/10 if approved: Create a partner-onboarding checklist and technical discovery ticket, reusing Piltover's HMAC/auth and import flow where possible. Done for scoping: Product chooses accept, decline, or park. If accepted, partner requirements and product owner are defined. Engineering follow-up has testable acceptance criteria for connection, import/sync behavior, error handling, and partner authentication. Automated triage by ProductClaw.
SummonersBase Link
Hello, I recently saw that you guys have partnered with Piltover Archive to allow linking your account to sync Riftbound decks. This seems like a great idea and a huge win for players and I'd love to try and get my deck builder, SummonersBase, supported as well. If you are interested please let me know! Thank you, Joe Winkler
Please allow stores to block "guest" signups
Due to some unethical use of guest registrations in my local area, I believe that it is necessary for a store to disable guest signups for events - both at the store level and at the individual event level. There are multiple bad actors that are abusing the guest registration option to sign up ghost accounts to fill up Lorcana Set Championships (and other events) and prevent others from registering. This is starting to cause major negative feelings within the local community, and has led to at least one player deciding not to compete any more.
Please let us track player histories backward through our events.
It would be awesome if we could select a player from tournament standings and follow that player’s event history to see what other stores and tournaments they have played in. There are a lot of times I recognize handles but not faces, and knowing which players I have seen at which stores would really help with that.
Judge program
I know you have the lore guide exam, this is great for those of us who know the CR well. One thing that would be nice, a program like discord has for their Mods. Something that can help those who know the rules really well, understand what actions should be taken when something goes wrong. IE: over the weekend a ruling issue arose. I handled the ruling issue but i should have made the players walk back the turns to the incorrect play and play out from there. By not doing so, i caused a player to stall at 19 when she should have quested to 21 after the ruling was made correctly. Had there been a program with examples and what to do to handle situations as a “Lore Guide” this would not have happened, allowing a more fair player experience for everyone involved
Next up
4Committed and queued
Make saved-deck event submission discoverability clearer in Phoenix
Source: Featurebase post 69ef1822c1bc08cddec3202d ("Additions to the decks feature") from Simeon N — https://cardeio.featurebase.app/p/additions-to-the-decks-feature Problem Players who already maintain decks on their profiles cannot easily tell how to use those saved decks for a specific event. The current feedback is not asking for a deckbuilder from scratch; it is saying the saved-deck → event flow feels missing or too hidden. Why this is likely a real gap Existing shipped work HYD2-4689 says players can select from saved decks when submitting to eligible events. New player feedback says: "It would be great to be able to assign decks we've added to our profiles to specific events. If that's actually possible, it isn't clear enough." That points to a discoverability / product-communication problem even if the underlying capability already exists. Who has the problem Players using Phoenix / Player Networks who keep saved decks on their profile and register for events where deck submission is relevant. Status quo / workaround Users have to guess where event-specific deck attachment happens, or assume they need to rebuild / re-enter the deck manually. Requested outcome Make it obvious in the event flow when a player can submit / attach one of their saved decks to that event, and make the missing-state clearer when an event does not currently allow or require deck submission. 90/10 direction Clarify the event-detail entry point and copy around deck submission rather than inventing a new deck-management model. Success criteria A player on an eligible event can clearly tell they can select from saved decks. The UI distinguishes "this event does not use deck submission" from "you have not submitted yet". A player can attach or update a saved deck for the event without guesswork. Adjacent, not duplicate HYD2-4689 — shipped saved-deck submission capability SENG-70 — TO-facing deck-submission copy/behavior confusion HYD2-5548 / HYD2-6659 — event-published deck browsing IA, not the player submission/discoverability problem Evidence Featurebase upvotes: 1 Category: Player Networks
Loading My Events page for a user results in 500 error
Description: The My Events page has been failing to load for a user davidpuentevsaja@gmail.com for the past few days on both phone and PC. Logging out and back in did not resolve it. Steps to Reproduce: Open the My Events page. View the page on mobile or desktop. Current Result: The page shows Error loading events: and does not load the user's events. Workarounds: None What or how many support tickets are blocked by this? One reported support conversation. Support was unable to reproduce the issue on other accounts, but was able to reproduce the issue by spoofing this user's account. Expected Result (Success Criteria): [ ] The My Events page loads the user's events normally on mobile and desktop.
Scope custom retailer banner image uploads in admin panel
Source: Featurebase post 6a1dbe90d52c7ddba4eede9a (allowing uploading of banner image) Featurebase: https://cardeio.featurebase.app/p/allowing-uploading-of-banner-image Submitted: 2026-06-01 17:17 UTC by Nicola C / Dungeon Street Signal: 1 upvote Request The retailer asks whether stores can upload their own image in the "banner section" and says this would be an "amazing graphic update". They also ask whether the option already exists and they simply could not find it. Product skepticism / problem framing This is a real retailer-admin customization signal, but it is not yet ready for backlog acceptance because the affected surface and underlying problem are ambiguous: Which banner section is meant: store profile, public store page, event banner, Dashboard 2.0/admin landing surface, or another retailer-admin area? Is this a discoverability problem for an existing upload path, or a missing capability? Who sees the banner and what job does it do for the retailer: branding, player trust, event promotion, or store identity? What constraints matter for a safe 90/10 version: image dimensions, moderation, game/publisher policy, default fallback, and whether custom images appear publicly? Current status quo / workaround Unknown. The post suggests the submitter could not find the option if it exists. There is no confirmed workaround or screenshot yet. Evidence Featurebase quote: "we think that allowing stores to upload their own images in the banner section could be an amazing graphic update. let us know if that is already possible and maybe we didn’t found the right option" 90/10 scoping path Ask the submitter for the exact page/banner section and a screenshot. Verify whether the requested upload path already exists and is discoverable. If missing, scope the smallest safe custom-banner upload for the intended retailer-admin surface, including validation, default fallback, and public/private visibility rules. Success criteria before moving to Backlog The exact banner surface is identified. Product decides whether custom retailer images are allowed on that surface. The first-version upload rules are explicit: dimensions, file types, moderation/abuse handling, default/fallback behavior, and where the image appears. If this is only discoverability, the accepted fix is framed as UI/help copy rather than a new upload feature.
Players want an opt-in friends view for event performance
Problem A Featurebase submitter wants to add friends to their account so they can see how friends are doing in events and view their overall performance. Today the likely workaround is manually searching public profile/event-history surfaces, which is fragmented and may conflict with player privacy expectations. Source: Featurebase post 6a1b70864c83df18ffb76d88 (Friends Add) by Justin T, 2026-05-30, 1 upvote: https://cardeio.featurebase.app/p/friends-add Product Skepticism Notes Actual problem: players lack an opt-in way to follow friends' organized-play activity and performance. Evidence: one Featurebase request/upvote so far; needs more demand before backlog acceptance. Status quo: manual lookup through public player/profile/event-history surfaces. Decision needed: whether this is a one-way follow, mutual friend request, team/group surface, or no social graph; must align with HYD2-7399 privacy controls for player event history. Adjacent work: HYD2-7152 is a broader player social/team concept, but this request is narrower around personal friends and performance visibility. 90/10 Shape To Consider A first slice could be an opt-in friends/following list that links to permitted player profile/history/performance surfaces, with no chat, UGC timeline, reactions, or publisher-controlled team features. Success Criteria [ ] Product decides follow vs mutual-friend behavior and default discoverability. [ ] Players can add/remove friends or follows with clear consent rules. [ ] Friends/following view shows only profile, event history, and performance data the target player's privacy settings permit. [ ] The feature cannot bypass HYD2-7399 event-history privacy decisions or API filtering. [ ] UI copy makes clear what friend visibility grants and what remains private. [ ] Analytics/support tracking can distinguish friend-discovery demand from broader team/social-feature demand.
In Progress
Actively being built
No In Progress issues
Done
1Recently shipped